and if it were your home, 2 - a conundrum

Imagine, let's put it in an Australian context, if Indonesia was granted half of Western Australia, despite people already living there, and then decided it wanted the other half as well. They had the better military, and international backing, so they evicted people from their homes, and put settler families in them, or demolished them, and built on the land. There was no reparation. In fact, the people who were evicted often had to pay for the demolition.

Of course, the equivalent is what the British and Irish (my ancestors) did to the Aboriginal people when they first decided Australia (not that it was called that, then) was a good place to set up camp. It is the whole premise of terra nullius. I did think that we had decided that it was a wrong and shameful part of our past, and that all people of the world had rights. I thought that was one of the reasons for Rudd saying sorry to the stolen generation, and one of the reasons why our government has decided to support the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Apparently not.

Tellingly, but not surprisingly, to the best of my knowledge the U.S. has not supported that declaration, and neither has New Zealand. I guess the surprising thing, given its current track record, is that Australia has decided to support it. Still, pay attention to the words of the British diplomat below. However, they are just words, and as Gideon Levy says, what is needed now, and had always been needed are deeds. The following is from ISM about ongoing house demolitions in East Jerusalem (which also occur in the rest of the occupied territories). Keep in mind that it is almost impossible for a Palestinian to acquire a housing/building permit.

Other Israeli changes in Sheikh Jarrah include plans to evict two large families from homes they have occupied for more than 50 years on the grounds that they are not legal owners. It is believed their dwellings will be given over to settlers. Plans to demolish 88 Palestinian homes in the Silwan neighbourhood are temporarily on hold as a result of international pressure.

A British diplomat criticised the Israeli steps last night. “They [the new Israeli government] asked us for a pause while they formulate policy but if there will be a pause in the peace process there also needs to be a pause in the actions we are seeing in East Jerusalem. Such steps contradict Israel’s stated goal of peace,” the diplomat said. [my emphasis] Read more

disappointed but not surprised

Too bad, it seems that Spain will probably suspend its investigation into war crimes that Israel is alleged to have committed in 2002.

Spanish prosecutors have asked a Madrid judge to suspend an investigation of seven Israeli officials over a 2002 bombing in Gaza that killed Hamas militant Salah Shehadeh and 14 others, including nine children.

It seems that the Israelis are now going to conduct their own investigation. Considering how quickly they declared that there were no war crimes committed in Gaza, despite a plethora of evidence to the contrary, I wouldn't be holding my breath for anything to come of it.

International law will apply to none, soon, it's obvious.

In some positive news, Australia has committed to honouring an election promise of signing the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. In 2007, 4 member states voted against the declaration, those being Australia, New Zealand, the U.S. and Canada.

The vote was 143 countries in favour, four against, and 11 abstaining.[5] ... The abstaining countries were Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Burundi, Colombia, Georgia, Kenya, Nigeria, Russian Federation, Samoa and Ukraine; another 34 member states were absent from the vote.